Maybe "branding" needs to be rebranded (and other random thoughts).

I've been posting my thoughts on business, brands and organizational success on this blog for the past eight years. During that time, I’ve written four books and I’ve spoken to hundreds of organizations around the world about marketplace success during chaotic times.

I recently paused to consider what I’ve discovered during my journey. What has changed? What has remained the same? What has puzzled me? Have my principles stood the test of time? Where is the world of business headed?

Rather than trying to distill my thoughts and insights into a pithy piece, I thought I’d simply share the results of my random, spiraling ruminations. I hope they make sense to you and provide worthy cause for your own reflection. And I'd love to know your thoughts as well.

The Grand Illusion. Most people understand the world by chopping it into bits and categorizing those bits. But it’s an illusion. For example, there is no discrete thing called “tree.” “Tree” is simply a word we’ve created to refer to a particular pattern of ground, atmosphere, energy consuming and producing cells moving in shapes we call “branches,” etc. The same is true in business. An organization is not a bunch of disconnected departments and activities, like marketing, finance, HR, operations, IT, et al. Rather, it’s an arrangement, or pattern, in which every so-called part is a function of the whole. I’ve come to find that this “whole” is only seen and appreciated by a very few exceptional leaders, and that this one distinction, this dominant viewpoint, makes all the difference to their ongoing success.

Bye-Bye Branding. Despite my effort with A Clear Eye for Branding and the efforts of many others, for the vast majority of people the words “brand” and “branding” will never take on the strategic and unifying significance that we preach. Rather than suggesting a business philosophy and systematic approach to creating happy customers and increasing profitability, brand and branding will continue to evoke naming, logos, design and other aesthetic and mnemonic concerns. Perhaps we need a new word; a new "brand."

What’s the Recipe? Business people hunger for a recipe for marketplace success. They swarm like bees to the plethora of books, articles and advisors that promise “the way,” despite the fact that there is no one way. At Southwest Airlines, the employee comes first. At Whole Foods, it’s the customer. At Apple, it’s the product. There are no formulas, but there are patterns. My goal is, and has always been, to expose those patterns and to have people feel them in their bones. Success is about discovering insights, seeing with new eyes, not about following a new blueprint.

Drowning in Complexity. The marketplace is growing increasingly complex. Rather than understanding the underlying patterns for success and being driven by purpose and passion, leaders are parsing events and information to an unmanageable degree. Their ever-frustrated effort to gain complete assurance by analyzing data is creating anxious, fearful and dispirited employees. And this insipid attitude is spilling over to their partners, customers, and to the bottom line.

Creation-Centric to Communication-Centric. The modern marketplace was built by entrepreneurs obsessed with creating breakthrough ideas that transformed people’s lives. Sadly, many of today’s leaders are milking the innovations of their predecessors. Instead of gaining new insights into how to improve people’s experiences and moving forward with bold innovations, they’re wrapping old offerings in new sales, communication and entertainment packaging. It’s a short-sighted, uninspiring, and future-mortgaging decision.

Where’s the Meaning? The marketplace is, was, and always will be about meaning; meaning that communicates to the world--and to ourselves--who we are, what we believe in, and to what groups we belong. We choose products, services and causes based on a feeling of receiving distinctive value--a unique bundle of social, aesthetic, and functional meanings that feed our hungers to be liked, respected, and discerning. Apple, and a handful of other organizations, understand and embrace this reality and therefore continue to draw meaning-making consumers towards their highmargin models. To my utter confusion, the rest continue to chase the elusive, deal-seeking consumers with large, leaky nets of promotions, discounts and incentives. And that’s no way to grow.

So, what do YOU think?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c684b53ef01675eac7513970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Maybe "branding" needs to be rebranded (and other random thoughts).:

Comments

Randy Bosch

Tom, I appreciate that you continuously analyse your propositions and suppositions relative to the history and facts in the field! Bravo! As to branding and marketing - branding will remain very important. It is the marketing mess that must be changed. Nassim Nicholas Taleb states (with some hyperbole) that marketing is necessary only if you have nothing worth selling. Informing the market about your products is essential, but the purchase decision for anything beneficial is best based upon experience - that of your peers, mentors and self. I am reminded that the first modern marketer is found in Genesis Chapter 3 - as self-serving as a "push poll" but much more deadly! Worth pondering, and it will take a while and a ton of effort to "reform" marketing and keep the value of "branding" from being sucked down by the charlatans. Branding is good!

Bumper Stickers

Brand awareness consists of brand recognition (eg: recognize a country, Italy) and brand recall (recite from memory the brand in a product category. eg: Italy for food). A nation must create brand awareness through repeated exposure and burning the brand in the minds of the consumers for later recall.

Jon Pietz

I think people and organizations are afraid to commit to something they can stand for. Therefore branding is often interpreted as a cosmetic exercise.

The word itself also suggests something on the surface rather than something within the character of an organization. But visionaries will always have a different interpretation.

Maybe we need to teach people how to be visionaries rather than beating the drum of branding. But as scarce as visionaries are, it seems easier to try to find them than teach someone how to think like one. Because the client with some measure of vision or guiding purpose in his work is much more likely to instinctively understand the point of branding.

Tumbleweed

A good article, Tom, but the online world does not make branding any less important. In fact, branding is even more important in the age of social media. It is so easy to post content - logos, images, text, videos - online that a person must have a certain level of trust in what he or she sees. And this trust must developed offline (TV, radio etc.) via branding. http://tumbleweedmarketinganalytics.com/

moncler jackets uk

makes all the difference to their ongoing success.

Eric Hoyt

Great read! As Walter Landor once said: “Products are built in the factory, brands are created in the mind.”

Dan McMillen

Great post, these are timeless topics.

Your "Bye Bye Branding" section really struck me. What you're saying here is really important for both B2B and B2C brands. Probably most important for B2B brands. They have to avoid the temptation to emulate B2C "brand" creation relying too heavily on marketing communications and PR.

Businesses (especially in B2B) have to deliver value consistantly. An attempt to manipulate the perception of value in the customer's mind will fail without real, concrete, value delivery. And scepticism about the company will be built into the customer's mind.

The comments to this entry are closed.