« Social media, branding and value | Main | CEO plans to make brand fly »

The silent killer

"The reason men oppose progress is not that they hate progress, but that they love inertia." - Elbert Hubbard

I've been doing a lot of traveling of late (probably too much), presenting to some very large and diverse groups.  Sometimes I'll begin my talks by displaying an image of footprints in the snow, while recounting a powerful, metaphorical story that goes something like this:

Do you remember when, as a child, you'd wake up to a pristine, snow covered landscape? You'd rush out the door on your way to school, zigging and zagging, pushing and dragging your feet to create a one-of-a-kind path?  And invariably, the next kid in the neighborhood would leave his home and follow your crooked path, kicking away more snow on his way.  And then the next kid, and the next, until eventually there was a well-worn, precisely defined route all the way to school.

Well, that's what happens with your mind as well.  If you think the same thoughts, or preformed the same task over and over again, you will develop a neural pathway in your brain.  Like a dry path in wet snow, it becomes a comfortable route; a path of least resistance.  To remove this habit or old way of thinking takes a focused effort. It requires that you step out of your rut and get your brain wet, cold and uncomfortable.

The audience members typically nod, signaling their understanding.  And then they go right back into their subconscious ruts, rejecting new concepts and rationalizing familiar ones.  Men, and women, love inertia.  And to my way of thinking, inertia is the silent killer of most businesses and, in some cases, entire industries.

Inertia in business, both up and down the chain of decision-making, is no different than inertia in other aspects of one's life; it has to do with protecting one's identity, immediate self-interest, and interpersonal relationships.  

Here are just a few thoughts that form when someone is exposed to a new business concept or idea; albeit most are below people's level of conscious awareness:

  • If that were true, and important right now, I'd have heard of it already.
  • Perhaps I'm simply too old school for this new fangled concept.
  • I'm too busy to think about that right now.  I'm way behind on my emails, tweets, follow up calls, appointments, to-do's, etc. and it will only cause me additional work.
  • He's saying that what we've done in the past is wrong. We're successful, so he obviously doesn't know what he's talking about.
  • If I endorse his idea, what does that say about me and my firm? We're suppose to be the ones with the answers.
  • If I change course, so and so will be disappointed and upset with me.  I'll wait and let someone else take the risk and make the decision. 
  • That's not what the "book" says.

I'm sure there are many more (If you have a favorite, post it in the comments). My point is simply this: the main enemy of ideas is not fear of change, but love of the way things are right now.  The love of inertia.

Newton's First Law of Motion states that objects in motion tend to remain in motion at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an outside force; objects at rest tend to remain at rest unless acted upon by an outside force. So if you're stuck, and you know it, your best bet may be to introduce an outside force.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c684b53ef0120a5a0ec2a970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The silent killer:

Comments

Vishal Tulsian

Hello Tom,

I agree that we form a neural pathway, which requires an outside force if any change is desired. In my experience, I have found that there are some people who are more likely to approach change and there are some who would not, no matter how much they are convinced for change or unhappy with their current condition. They usually find some ingenious way to convince themselves otherwise. What do you think is the reason? Because the ones who are more likely to change also have formed some neural pathways. Is there something else these individuals possess, which cannot be explained by neural pathways?

Tom Asacker

Thanks for the insight Vishal. And I certainly agree. In fact, I know some of those people all too well. And I believe the difference between the two lies, in fact, in the depth of those neural pathways.

In my experience, people who are more predisposed to change have had more experiences than those who are not. Those new experiences created new pathways, thus lessening the affect of existing ones.

As the American psychiatrist Milton Erickson made clear, "change will lead to insight far more often than insight will lead to change."

Strategic Growth Advisors

Hey, Tom. Thanks for the insightful post as always.

In my own point of view, business players these days are not afraid of change. However, they want the "change" to happen just as they want it.

Instead of setting a neural path to have the least resistance as possible (borrowing from your article, of course), they give change a difficult journey: always fighting it off, proving it wrong, until their beliefs and ideas are proven flawed and change wins in the long run.

Jon P

In my experience, new ideas aren't met with excuses as much as nods and smiles. But very often, it's the look in their eyes that says "that'll never happen".

Dez Fragge

Hi Tom, Enjoyed reading your article 'The silent killer'. I am currently working / studying various challenges faced in implementing change. I particularly enjoyed reading the typical thoughts that represent resistance to a new idea. It was real... it made me tingle! :)

Andy

Tom, great post (again). I think the rut is probably bigger than ever at the moment. Stray from the path and you get noticed, and for many it's better not to be noticed during the times we're in. Similar to sticking your head above the trench.

Of course those that do stray and succeed tread a new path for others. We just need a few more of those leaders...

Dan Cote

Tom:

I agree, but I also think some people don't reject change because they "love" inertia, but rather, they can't visualize and develop the stepping stones to the end goal.

If a person were stranded on an island (and eager to get off of it) and didn't know how to swim and saw a rescue boat, inertia's not holding him back -- life (as he knows it) is better than the promising alternative.

Caylee

Hey Tom.

I am subscribed to your blog and every couple weeks I read several posts at once. I find myself wanting to print them all out and have certain clients read them. This obviously wouldn't work - but all of the wisdom is speaking right to me. I am just trying to find a way of implementing all of this. And this specific post might be a way to do it. Understanding them.

Thanks for all your hard work.

The comments to this entry are closed.